Mainrich International

Engineering Comparison · Architecture Comparison

Radial Multi-pole vs Arc Segment

Radial Multi-pole RingvsArc Segment Assembly

A radial ring has one magnetic body; a segmented rotor uses separate magnets. Compare the waveform and assembly in the actual motor.

Key takeaways

  • Radial orientation is established during manufacture; magnetization defines the pole pattern and skew.
  • The documented 10-pole N45SH radial specimen has a trapezoidal OD surface trace. The separate integrated Halbach sample has a sinusoidal trace.
  • The November 2025 comparison used 10-pole Ø36.6 × Ø29.8 × 17 mm specimens: N45SH radial and integrated Halbach, and N50SH segmented. KCS-906A OD surface scans are historical sample evidence; probe standoff and uncertainty were not recorded, and the analyser result was marked not judged.
  • OD probe scans do not establish air-gap field, motor torque ripple, efficiency or production-lot variation.

Overview

Overview

Radial rings remove adhesive joints between magnetic segments, but the ring still needs mounting, retention and inspection. Segmented designs have separate pole pieces and assembly joints. Neither construction guarantees a waveform or motor outcome; compare the full rotor, stator and control conditions.

Side-by-side

Side-by-Side Comparison

Reference properties and design questions. A count of comparison points does not establish a material or supplier recommendation.

CriterionRadial Multi-pole RingArc Segment Assembly
ConstructionOne radially oriented sintered magnetic bodySeparate magnets assembled around the rotor
Documented waveformTrapezoidal OD scan on the 10-pole N45SH sampleSeparate historical N50SH specimen; keep its test identity
Motor torque and efficiencyRequires matched motor testsRequires matched motor tests
Production consistencyRequires a defined inspection plan and lot dataRequires a defined inspection plan and lot data
AssemblyNo joints between magnetic segments; rotor mounting still requiredSegment positioning, joints and retention required
Pole patternConfirm orientation and magnetization fixtureConfirm segment orientation and arrangement
Tooling and unit costQuote for the geometry and volumeQuote for the geometry and volume

Confirm source conditions and the actual part requirements before using reference values as acceptance limits.

Use cases

Conditions for considering each option

When Radial Multi-pole Ring wins

  • The specified one-piece ring meets the waveform and rotor fit requirements.
  • Removing segment assembly joints benefits the validated production process.

When Arc Segment Assembly wins

  • Separate pole pieces suit the rotor geometry or development changes.
  • The qualified segment assembly meets performance and cost requirements.

How to choose

Decision Framework

Decision framework

Start with the required field waveform and rotor geometry. Compare complete motor results under matched conditions, then assess tooling, assembly, retention and inspection cost. There is no established universal torque-ripple percentage or monthly-volume crossover between these constructions.

Specs

Related NdFeB Grades

Industries

Related Applications

Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

When should I use a radial ring instead of segments?

+

When the qualified ring and rotor assembly meet the motor requirements and production plan. The documented radial sample has a trapezoidal surface trace; choosing a radial ring does not guarantee sinusoidal air-gap flux or low torque ripple.

How much higher is torque ripple with arc segments?

+

The supplied surface scans do not measure torque ripple. Compare matched motors with defined stator, air gap, speed, load and controller settings before assigning a percentage difference.

Are radial rings more expensive than segments?

+

Compare quotes for tooling, magnet production, assembly and inspection at the intended volume. A one-piece ring removes joints between segments but still needs rotor assembly. No universal cost crossover is established.

Need help deciding?

Share your drawing, operating conditions and acceptance requirements for review. Human response within 1 business day.